Just came across this article on the BBC:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10774406
"The survey found that for DSL services advertised as being "up to" 20Mbps, only 2% of customers got speeds in the range of 14-20Mbps. Of the others, 32% were getting a 8-14Mbps service and 65%, 8Mbps or less."
2% of users get 75% (or better) of advertised speeds? That's pretty damned harsh. That's the kind of thing that your customers ought to know up front.
But that's DSL for you. The article gives a fairly good explanation of some of the reasons why DSL sucks. What we need is fiber-to-the-home and none of this DSL crap:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2010/04/c6687.html
http://seekingalpha.com/article/197137-competition-is-starting-to-weigh-on-rogers-communications?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
For anyone who's had to cleanup some mail problems with Postfix configuration (or more often with other things, like anti-spam, tied in ...
-
In the course of troubleshooting the office Jabber server the other day, I came across some interesting info about the various caches that O...
-
For everyone who uses cron, you are familiar with the job schedule form: min hr day-of-month month day-of-week <command> A problem...
No comments:
Post a Comment